By Lauren Friedman, Jun 12 2015
Of all people who died in 2012 (approximately 56 million in total), more than half died from just 10 causes. Even more remarkable, just two leading causes of death — stroke and ischemic heart disease — were together responsible for a full quarter of those deaths.
Here’s a look at the data, from the World Health Organization:
John Sculley, ex-CEO of Apple and Pepsi, and also health technology investor, gave his view on healthcare inequality and how smartphones could maybe build more equality and healthcare access in developing countries. We interviewed him at the Digital Health Live conference in Dubai today, where he spoke about the future of healthcare.
As former CEO of Apple and Pepsi (1977-1983), John Sculley knows brands. But Sculley is now talking about looking beyond the brand.
Before, big brands were everything—but now, customers are better informed with different tools. He is now interested in how big data is changing customer decision making.
“Healthcare Missed the Digital Revolution”
When it comes to healthcare and data, there is room for optimisation: “Only 20% is evidence-based medicine that physicians apply, so it’s increasingly about the data”.
Healthcare needs to make more use of the data that is out there. At Digital Health Live 2015, Sculley says that billions of devices will be connected to the Internet Of Things by 2020 (Morgan Stanley mentions that it could be as much as 75 billion devices). But most of the connections will be machine-to-machine and not connected to people directly.
The smartphone is a channel to deliver healthcare information to places never before possible. For example, small information snippets can radically alter the healthcare statistics around birth and pregnancy.
Those billions of connected devices are not equally distributed, and the question will be about how to best extract valuable insights and deliver the information to where it is most needed.
– See more at: http://nuviun.com/content/john-sculley–the-uberisation-of-healthcare#sthash.c2gP7rzY.dpuf
Portugal, Spain and Malta are the European countries where people receive the most psychiatric treatments.
According to this infographic made by Statista , despite the stereotype of the happy disposition of the southern Europeans, the most busiest psychiatrist are in the South of Europe.These statistics have been made after one year of research and the results show that the Portuguese psychiatrists had 294 patients and 2.94 percent of the country’s entire population received psychiatric treatment.
At the second place are the Spanish psychiatrists, who had 255 patients and 2.04 percent of the population received psychiatric treatment. Malta is the third country, with an average of 250 patients and 1% of the population receiving treatment. Romania and Slovenia close the top five.
What do you think could be the explanation of this issue?
Do you think there is any regional, socio-cultural or political explanation?
Do you think the economic crisis increased this issue?
via Portugal Has the EU’s Busiest Psychiatrists – OneEurope.
 Release date: 16 September 2014 |
Geographic Variations in Health Care What Do We Know and What Can Be Done to Improve Health System Performance? Variations in health care use within a country are complicated. In some cases they may reflect differences in health needs, in patient preferences or in the diffusion of a therapeutic innovation; in others they may not. There is evidence that some of the observed variations are unwarranted, signalling under- or over-provision of health services, or both. This study documents geographic variations for high-cost and high-volume procedures in select OECD countries. It finds that there are wide variations not only across countries, but within them as well. A mix of patient preferences and physician practice styles likely play an important part in this, but what part of the observed variations reflects over-provision, or whether there are unmet needs, remain largely unexplained. This report helps policy makers better understand the issues and challenges around geographic variations in health care provision and considers the policy options. > OECD press release: Governments must tackle regional variations in health care use, says OECD |
Health policies and data – OECD
16/9/14 – Health care use varies widely across countries but can also
vary as much or more within countries. Governments should do more to
improve their health systems to prevent unnecessary interventions and
ensure that everyone has the same access to quality healthcare, wherever
they live, according to a new OECD report.
Geographic Variations in Health Care analyses
the geographic variations across a range of high-volume and high-cost
health care activities, such as heart bypass or knee replacement
operations.
Some of the variations observed in the 13 OECD countries* are
unwarranted, says the report, and ought to be tackled so that
high-quality health systems deliver the care patients need.
The number of patients admitted to a hospital for a reason other than
surgery, for example, is twice as high in Australia, Germany and Israel
than in Canada, Portugal and Spain. Admission rates also vary widely
within countries: in some parts of Australia, Canada, England, Finland,
Italy or Portugal, a patient is two to three times more likely to be
admitted to hospital than in other parts of those countries.
A patient is also three times more likely to undergo cardiac
revascularisation procedures in Germany and Israel than in countries
with the lowest levels of intervention. In most countries, these
procedures have the highest level of variation across geographical
areas. Knee replacement rates vary by more than five-fold within Canada,
Portugal and Spain, and by two-to three-fold across geographic areas in
most OECD countries.
Caesarean section rates are on the rise. The probability to give
birth by C-section is 50% higher in Italy, Portugal, Australia,
Switzerland and Germany than in the other participating countries.
C-section rates vary little within countries, except in Italy where they
vary by six-fold across provinces.
To tackle unwarranted variations in health care use, governments should put in place:
The report’s main findings will be presented at a joint conference held by the OECD and the Bertelsmann Foundation on 16th September 2014 in Berlin (www.faktencheck-gesundheit.de).
For more information including detailed country notes, see: http://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/medical-practice-variations.htm
Cancer Care | OECD READ edition.
Cancer Care: Assuring Quality to Improve Survival surveys the policy trends in cancer care over recent years and looks at survival rates to identify the why some countries are doing better than others.
Arts education is often said to be a means of developing critical and creative thinking. Arts education has also been argued to enhance performance in non-arts academic subjects such as mathematics, science, reading and writing, and to strengthen students’ academic motivation, self-confidence, and ability to communicate and co-operate effectively. Arts education thus seems to have a positive impact on the three subsets of skills that we define as “skills for innovation”: subject-based skills, including in non-arts subjects; skills in thinking and creativity; and behavioural and social skills.
This OECD report “Art for Art’s Sake: The Impact of Arts Education,” by Ellen Winner, Thalia Goldstein , and Stéphan Vincent-Lancrin, examines the state of empirical knowledge about the impact of arts education on these kinds of outcomes. The kinds of arts education examined include arts classes in school (classes in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance), arts-integrated classes (where the arts are taught as a support for an academic subject), and arts study undertaken outside of school (e.g. private music lessons; out-of-school classes in theatre, visual arts, and dance). The report does not deal with education about the arts or cultural education, which may be included in all kinds of subjects.
